Most of our measures of a key cognitive process don’t agree
Summary
Scientific journals typically reject negative results because studies showing no effect are difficult to publish. However, the prominent journal Nature recently made a rare exception to this publication standard.
It's widely acknowledged that it's nearly impossible to publish negative results in scientific journals. "We didn't see anything" is a much harder sell than finding that a hypothesis is clearly right. Findings of no effect tend to either be shuffled off to low-profile journals or left behind as unpublished lab lore. The high-profile journal Nature, however, made a notable exception…
Source: Read the full story at Ars Technica - All content
Disclaimer: This content is for informational and educational purposes only and is not financial, investment or trading advice. Tech & Money Press is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. Trading stocks, options and crypto involves substantial risk, including the loss of your entire investment. Do your own research and consult a licensed professional before making any financial decision. The authors may hold positions in the securities mentioned. News summaries are written with AI assistance from the original publisher's report and may contain errors; always check the original source. Full disclaimer.